JAPHTN-HAN
by Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara
openjournathemelogo
Quick jump to page content
  • Main Navigation
  • Main Content
  • Sidebar

JAPHTN-HAN
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
  • Announcements
  • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
  • Announcements
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JAPHTN-HAN, July 2022
  4. Articles

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JAPHTN-HAN, July 2022

Issue Published : July 31, 2022
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sistem Perizinan Berbasis Risiko: Sebuah Perbandingan Antara Negara Australia dan Negara Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i2.30
Merissa Bhernaded Lie
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Surabaya

Corresponding Author(s) : Merissa Bhernaded Lie

merissalie@gmail.com

JAPHTN-HAN, Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JAPHTN-HAN, July 2022
Article Published : July 31, 2022

Share
WA Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Pinterest Email Telegram
  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • References
  • Authors Details

Abstract

Konsep berbasis risiko bukan hal yang baru di dunia, berbagai negara di dunia telah menerapkan konsep berbasis risiko dalam regulasi berbagai bidang salah satunya adalah bidang perizinan. Penggunaan konsep berbasis risiko dalam bidang perizinan baru saja digunakan oleh Negara Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Konsep berbasis risiko dalam bidang perizinan digunakan di Indonesia dengan tujuan mendorong tumbuhnya usaha dan investasi khususnya bagi Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah. Pengaturan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko secara limitatif tercantum dalam Pasal 6 dan Pasal 12 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Pemerintah Indonesia kemudian mengeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko sebagai tindak lanjut dari pengaturan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko tersebut. Dalam rangka mewujudkan sistem berbasis risiko secara efektif dan efisien, pengaturan yang tepat sangat diperlukan maka untuk memperluas pengetahuan mengenai subyek ini dapat dilakukan perbandingan dengan negara lain yang telah lebih dulu menerapkan perizinan berbasis risiko seperti halnya negara Australia.

Keywords

Perizinan Berbasis Risiko Konsep Berbasis Risiko

Full Article

Generated from XML file
References
  1. Adrian Sutedi,Hukum Perizinan Dalam Sektor Pelayanan Publik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
  2. Arias-Barrera, Ligia. “The Risk-Based Regulation Approach : The Case of the UK Regime of Central Counterparties in the OTC Derivatives Market.” Warwick School of Law Research Paper, no. 19 (2015).
  3. Bisariyadi. “Pergulatan Paham Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) Dan Negara Regulasi (Regulatory State) Dalam Perkara Konstitusional.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 23, no. 4 (2016): 531–51.
  4. DPR, Badan Legislasi. “Konsep Perizinan Usaha Berbasis Risiko Perlu Diterapkan.” DPR RI, 2020. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/29398/t/Konsep+Perizinan+Usaha+Berbasis+Risiko+Perlu+Diterapkan.
  5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA NSW). “Environmental Management Calculation Protocol,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/environmental-management-calculation-protocol.
  6. Environment Protection Authority NSW. “Environment Protection Authority Compliance Policy,” 2013. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/regulatory-response-and-risk-based-licensing-system.
  7. Environment Protection Authority (EPA). “EPA Licensing Guideline : Environmental Risk Levels,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/introduction.
  8. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). “RBA Guidance for Legal Professionals,” 2007.
  9. Levi-Faur, David. “The Odyssey of the Regulatory State Episode One: The Rescue of the Welfare State.” Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, no. 39 (2011): 36. http://regulation.huji.ac.il.
  10. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
  11. NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). “Protection of the Environment Operations Act Licence Risk Level : Licensee Appeal and Internal Review Guidelines,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/risk-assessment-process.
  12. Penman, Carrie. “Shifting Your Regulatory Compliance to a Risk-Based Approach.” NavexGlobal.com, 2021. https://www.navexglobal.com/blog/article/risk-based-approach-regulatory-compliance/.
  13. Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.
  14. Sugono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.
  15. Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996.
Read More

References


Adrian Sutedi,Hukum Perizinan Dalam Sektor Pelayanan Publik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Arias-Barrera, Ligia. “The Risk-Based Regulation Approach : The Case of the UK Regime of Central Counterparties in the OTC Derivatives Market.” Warwick School of Law Research Paper, no. 19 (2015).

Bisariyadi. “Pergulatan Paham Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) Dan Negara Regulasi (Regulatory State) Dalam Perkara Konstitusional.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 23, no. 4 (2016): 531–51.

DPR, Badan Legislasi. “Konsep Perizinan Usaha Berbasis Risiko Perlu Diterapkan.” DPR RI, 2020. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/29398/t/Konsep+Perizinan+Usaha+Berbasis+Risiko+Perlu+Diterapkan.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA NSW). “Environmental Management Calculation Protocol,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/environmental-management-calculation-protocol.

Environment Protection Authority NSW. “Environment Protection Authority Compliance Policy,” 2013. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/regulatory-response-and-risk-based-licensing-system.

Environment Protection Authority (EPA). “EPA Licensing Guideline : Environmental Risk Levels,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/introduction.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF). “RBA Guidance for Legal Professionals,” 2007.

Levi-Faur, David. “The Odyssey of the Regulatory State Episode One: The Rescue of the Welfare State.” Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, no. 39 (2011): 36. http://regulation.huji.ac.il.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA). “Protection of the Environment Operations Act Licence Risk Level : Licensee Appeal and Internal Review Guidelines,” n.d. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing-and-regulation/licensing/environment-protection-licences/risk-based-licensing/risk-assessment-process.

Penman, Carrie. “Shifting Your Regulatory Compliance to a Risk-Based Approach.” NavexGlobal.com, 2021. https://www.navexglobal.com/blog/article/risk-based-approach-regulatory-compliance/.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.

Sugono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006.

Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996.

Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 80 Download : 132

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Table Of Contents

Themes by Openjournaltheme.com

Author Resources

  • Focus and Scope
  • Editorial Team
  • Publication Ethics
  • List of Review

Author Resources

  • Focus and Scope
  • Editorial Team
  • Publication Ethics
  • List of Review

Flag Counter


Web Analytics   Statistik Pengunjung

CALL FOR PAPER 

 
Twitter    Facebook

 

REFERENCE TOOLS

PLAGIARISM TOOLS

 

PROFREADING TOOLS

MEMBER OF

 

Flag Counter


Web Analytics   Statistik Pengunjung

Keywords

 

 

Editorial Pick

Analisis Final dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum

January 31, 2022
Zulkifli Aspan et al.

Disfungsional Proses Dismissal Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 41/G/LH/2018/PTUN.PBR

January 31, 2022
Sulistyowati

Politik Dinasti Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Persimpangan Antara Hak Asasi dan Demokrasi

January 31, 2022
Farida Azzahra et al.

Model Pemilihan Serentak dan Peranan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Pada Pemilihan Serentak Tahun 2024

January 31, 2022
Wilma Silalahi

Perdebatan Status Uang dan Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dalam Pemeriksaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara

January 31, 2022
Fauzan Ghafur

Kompleksitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

January 31, 2022
Aini Shalihah et al.

Bentuk Ideal Tindak Lanjut Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang

January 31, 2022
Eka N.A.M. Sihombing et al.

Kekosongan Hukum Peraturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilu: Hambatan Pemilu Demokratis dan Berintegritas Rezim Orde Baru

January 31, 2022
Rahmat Bijak Setiawan Sapii et al.

© Copyright of Jurnal APHTN-HAN. Published by APHTN-HAN Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Creative Commons LicenseLicensed under  a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Themes by Openjournaltheme.com