Perbandingan Desain Isu Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.55Keywords:
Desain Isu, Judicial Review, Hukum Perbandingan, Indonesia, ThailandAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan desain isu kewenangan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Thailand. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) Bagaimana desain isu kewenangan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Thailand? (2) Bagaimana perbandingan karakteristik desain isu kewenangan judicial review antara Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Thailand?. Metode penelitian yang penulis gunakan ialah metode penelitian kualitatif dan jenis penelitian normatif yang menggunakan sumber data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal, buku, dan sumber internet. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya kesamaan karakteristik desain isu kewenangan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dan Thailand dari segi model judicial review sentralistik, jumlah hakim, dan akses pengadilan yang dapat dilakukan oleh setiap warga negara
Downloads
References
Barton, G. 2002. Gus Dur: The Authorised Biography of Abdurrahman Wahid. Jakarta: Equinox.
Bell, D.A. 2000. East Meets West. New Jersey: Priceton University Press.
Butt, S. & Lindsey, T. 2008. Economic Reform Ehen the Constitution Matters: Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and Article 33. Bulletin of Indonesia Economic Studies, 44 (2): 239-262.
Connors, M.K. 2003. Democracy and National Identity in Thailand. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Dixon, R., Ginsburg, T., Cheibub, J.A. & Choudhry, S. 2014. Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dressel, B. & Tonsakulrungruang, K. 2018. Coloured Judgements? The Work of the Thai Constitutional Court, 1998-2016. Journal of Contemporary Asia.
Freedomhouse. www.freedomhouse.org [diakses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2021 pada pukul 20.30]
Garlicki, L. 2007. Constitutional Courts Versus Sumpreme Courts. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (1): 44-68
Ginsburg, T. 2002. Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts. Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 3 (1): 1-38
Ginsburg, T. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies, Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, T. 2008. Constitutional Courts in East Asia: Understanding Variation. Journal of Comparative Law, III(2).
Harding, A. & Leyland, P. 2008. The Constitutional Courts of Thailand and Indonesia: Two Case Studies from South East Asia. Journal of Comparative Law, 3(2).
Harding, A. & Leyland, P. 2011. The Constitutional System of Thailand A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Harding, A., Chen, H.Y.A., Ginsburg, T., Roux, T. & Dixon, R. 2018. Constitutional Courts in Asia A Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Indrayana, D. 2008. Indonesian Constitutional Reform 1999-2002: An Evaluation of Constitutional-making in Transition.
Jackson, V.C. & Tushnet, M. 2006. Comparative Constitutional Law. Kedua ed. New York: Foundation Press.
Kansil, C.S.T. 2008. Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. https://kemlu.go.id/bangkok/en/read/thailand/1813/etc-menu [diakses pada tanggal 8 Juni 2021 pukul 19.56]
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Sejarah Pemilu 1999. http://www.kpu.go.id/Sejarah/pemilu1999.shtml. [diakses pada tanggal 20 Oktober 2021 pukul 10.35]
Leyland, P. 2007. Thailand’s Constitutional Watchdog: Dobermans, Bloodhounds or lapdogs?’’. Journal of Comparative Law, 2(2).
Lindsey, T. 1996. Indonesian Law, LMC 301. Darwin, N.T.: Northern Territory University Faculty of Law, Centre for Southeast Asian Law.
Lindsey, T. 2002. Indonesian Constitutional Reform: Muddling towards Democracy. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law, 6(1).
Mietzner, M. 2010. Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(3): 397–424.
Putra, Antoni. 2018. Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15 (2): 69-79
Simon, B. 2015. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Stotzky, I.P. 2004. Democratic Theory, the Courts and the Press. Democratization. 11(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JAPHTN-HAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
